TNA vs. WWE
#101
Posted 16 July 2007 - 04:17 PM
Nice to know there is someone else on here who enjoys Regal's work. I think he is really underrated by WWE. If he wasn't such good buddies with HHH, i doubt he'd still be there
As for Jackass...i hope Umaga stiffs the crap outta all of them.
BTW Artistix, do you guys the Tagged Classic sets in Oz?
#102
Posted 16 July 2007 - 04:34 PM
Sorry?
Tagged Classic?
#103
Posted 16 July 2007 - 08:32 PM
#104
Posted 16 July 2007 - 09:42 PM
Well said. They can kiss my curvey behind as well!!
#105
Posted 17 July 2007 - 12:10 AM
as for the tagged classics sets, i have no idea why they escape the editing, but i'm not one to look a gift horse in the mouth!
and artistix - i think you answered my question
in case you missed it on the previoyus page, here is a link to the Tagged Classics ordering site
#106
Posted 17 July 2007 - 03:12 PM
I'm SO annoyed. Why, why, why do these things never happen to Cena? For those who haven't heard, Edge is injured and is gonna have to drope the belt.
First Undertaker, and now Edge - two guys that i actually want to see headlining shows. I don't want to speculate too much until after the SD tapings, but the only guy on SD who isn't really doing anything right now and could be considered a legitimate threat to a World Champ is Mark Henry...
*SHUDDERS*
#107
Posted 17 July 2007 - 04:57 PM
#108
Posted 17 July 2007 - 06:11 PM
#109
Posted 17 July 2007 - 07:22 PM
#110
Posted 17 July 2007 - 09:24 PM
There are still younger fella's over at Wrestlingfigs.com who don't seem to understand what happened.
They are quite annoyed that WWE is showing no respect for Benoit & wish the media would stop portraying him as a monster.
One forgets how much harder this would be for the younger folk to grasp.
***
Edge is injured you say Riker...I heard Kane injured him during the Mardi Gras segment.
Were people always being severly injured in WWF/WWE...or is it more so nowadays that they are worked till they die?
#111
Posted 17 July 2007 - 09:35 PM
In regards to injusry, the new high impact/ high flying style of wrestling has taken a severe toll on guys. A good match used to be a lockup,test of strength, and a few armdrags/bodyslams. Now its completely different. Just backyard wrestling I can remmeber how sore I felt after only a few days of wrestling. I cant imagine what these guys are going through. With there being no offseason in wrestling these guys cant ever recover from nagging injuries like other pro atheltes can. Many have suggested that there be a mandatory vacation instituted for each individual on a rotating schedule.
#112
Posted 17 July 2007 - 10:47 PM
Thats seems to be the wisest course of action...
I remember after her feud with Trish Stratus for the championship, Stacy Kiebler had to take over a month off for her body to recover.
I don't think any of the male talent would be that lucky....though I dare say they would not ask unless it were life threatening.
How many times does your average WWE wrestler fight each week? I know there are house shows as well as Raw/SD/ECW.
#113
Posted 17 July 2007 - 11:26 PM
I am more upset over the 'death' of 'Johnny Nitro' and the birth of 'John Morrison'. What the hell? The Nitro character was fine as it was. And i much prefer the name Nitro to one that also happens to be the name of a supermarket lol. Does Vince hate WCW that much that he can't stand to see 'Nitro' suceed within his product?
as far as the injuries go...it seems as if everybody on the roster BUT Cena gets injured. I don't really wish injury on anyone, but it is perplexing...i guess its asol a testament to the amount of physical punishment Cena can take and also how safe he is in the ring
#114
Posted 18 July 2007 - 06:22 AM
Raw on Monday
Samckdown/ECW on Tuesday taped/live in that order
Each brand has house shows usually on Th/F/Sat/Sun those change according to bookings
1 (sometimes 2) PPV a month on Sun
Most weeks the guys will have off the middle of the week. This is very different from the 80s where guys were traveling alsmot all the time so the workload has lessened to an extent. Still being on the road 250+ days a year leads to the drug culture in the WWE. Steriods by themselves dont kill people its the "drug cocktail" that stops a weakened heart. These guys are on uppers,downers, cocaine, alcohol, painkillers, etc. It just doesnt medically work. Meltzer (who I think fabricates his stories and subscribes to yellow journalism to sell his newsletter) quotes 62 wrestlers dying under 50 in the last 10 years. Many are people youve never heard of and many die from accidents orunrelated illness like cancer but he counts them. It is still disturbing but not in the least bit shocking looking at some of their lifestyles.
I cant believe they changed Nitros characters. They are just making every wrong decision lately. As for Cena he wrestles a more classic low impact style ala Hogan/Warrior although not as bad. That style leads to less injury.
#115
Posted 19 July 2007 - 02:27 AM
But yeah, i take your point. Thats why i always shake my head in amusement when people say 'wrestling is fake' (which is a whole other topic by itself). Sure, it is just a TV show (like the critic's favourite soap or movie lol), but the non-wrestling fan will never understand the sacrifices these athletes have to make just to make a living in wrestling, never mind suceeding
back to Nitro...i try not to make snap judgements or have a knee-jerk reaction to something like this as i prefer to see things develop before dishing out criticism or praise but i can't get over the name change. i was a fan of his 'A-List' gimmick/look, but everyone needs a change now and again to keep themselves refreshing so again i wanna wait to see how the actual character plays out. But John Morrison - i'm still baffled. You would've thought that if he was due for a change that it would've happened before he made his ECW debut.
#116
Posted 19 July 2007 - 06:13 AM
Ive never seen a world champion switch his gimmick while holding the title. I agree that a change should have been made before jumping to ecw. It just goes to show you that the WWE has no long term planning in mind. Up until the Vince Russo era in the late 90s, the WWF would be booked for 6 months in advance. Their lucky now if they know whats going on tommorrow.
In another piece of badly timed news, John Kronus one half of the Elimators with Saturn died yesterday. I guess this makes Meltzer's list go to 63 wrestlers under 50 who have died in the last 10 years.
#117
Posted 19 July 2007 - 03:18 PM
I think the only long-term planning WWE do is who they want to be headlining the next Wrestlemania lol. Although to be fair, in an industry like wrestling, its hard for long-term planning, as the recent injury crisis has shown. Taker was supposed to get a long reign, but he got injured. Kennedy was supposed to be Money in the Bank for a while, but he got injured, etc, etc, etc. And in Johnny Nitro's case, i don't think its fair to accuse WWE of a lack of long-term planning too greatly...he shouldn't be ECW champ, it should be Benoit. But you can't legislate for things such as the Benoit tragedy - although that still doesn't excuse WWE for abruptly changing Nitro's gimmick
As for Kronus, i read about it and it took a while for the name to click. I can count the number of Eliminator matches i have seen using the fingers of one hand, but what i have seen impressed me greatly. Through the Eliminators, for me persoanlly, its also great to see a really talented side of Perry Saturn, seeing as most of my exposure to (and my enduring memories of) Saturn was his infamous 'Moppy' gimmick. RIP John Kronus. Any news on how he died?
#118
Posted 19 July 2007 - 05:57 PM
#119
Posted 19 July 2007 - 07:21 PM
WWE is starting to book like WCW did in the mid to late 90s. It's at the point where I recently heard that the writers were working on changes for a Smackdown show AS it was filming.
I was reading somewhere that his death occured just days after knee surgery, though I'm not sure you could connect the surgery to death exactly. As for him as a wrestler, I don't think I've seen many of his matches because the name is definitely not clicking for me.
WWE and TNA are both in a creative slump in terms of writing talent. WWE is definitely starting to book like WCW did in the 90s. If that's the case, then I equate TNA as this decades ECW. They may think they are the WCW or WWF of today, but they barely fill up the small arenas in which they do shows.
#120
Posted 19 July 2007 - 08:08 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users