Hi. It's my first post here and I just gotta say: I SO agree with you on the phasers and the tricorders!
Someone has to do more affordably-priced versions of these and who, if not Diamond Select?
Trek Tek and ships wish list
Started by knightone, Aug 05 2010 08:36 PM
43 replies to this topic
#41
Posted 07 November 2010 - 10:28 AM
#42
Posted 07 November 2010 - 10:53 AM
No doubt about it ... we need the Voyager & DS9 (or Defiant) ships to complete the main character ships from each TV series.
DST has already done the ships for TOS, Next Generation & Enterprise TV series ... and I would love to have a representation from the remaining series.
DST has already done the ships for TOS, Next Generation & Enterprise TV series ... and I would love to have a representation from the remaining series.
#43
Posted 09 November 2010 - 07:30 PM
QUOTE (Lexpro @ Nov 7 2010, 10:28 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Hi. It's my first post here and I just gotta say: I SO agree with you on the phasers and the tricorders!
Someone has to do more affordably-priced versions of these and who, if not Diamond Select?
Someone has to do more affordably-priced versions of these and who, if not Diamond Select?
Welcome to the board. It's good to have you here.
Yes, DST has done such a good job on the Trek Tek releases, they have to do some TNG era props as well. C'mon DST, throw the 24th century fans a bone!
#44
Posted 09 November 2010 - 07:45 PM
Hey Lexpro! welcome welcome!
You know... I went out looking to see who has Medical Tric's in stock and couldn't find any of the major players selling them for cost! I've got a science tric in parts on my bench right now... just because for what DST charges for them they are fun to experiment with!
You know... I went out looking to see who has Medical Tric's in stock and couldn't find any of the major players selling them for cost! I've got a science tric in parts on my bench right now... just because for what DST charges for them they are fun to experiment with!
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users