All Good Things Enterprise Coming Back
#61 Guest_user897_*
Posted 20 February 2013 - 04:21 PM
Enjoy!
AGT Enterprise-D on Flickr
#62
Posted 20 February 2013 - 04:53 PM
Great photos!
#63 Guest_user897_*
Posted 20 February 2013 - 05:28 PM
#64
Posted 20 February 2013 - 05:54 PM
Thanks, I may someday refer back to these photos, if they are still there, to do the same paint upgrade to my original issues.
Perhaps this has already come up (probably), but be sure you specify to whomever you trade with that you are looking for perfect audio pitch. The originals had problems as well. I bought two AGT Ds, and one has wonky audio while the other is fine. I do feel like the more you play the audio, it starts to correct itself somehow, but it never becomes perfect. I also bought two normal Ds and the same happened there (one good, one bad).
Were those really back in 2008/2009? That seems too long ago... What have I been doing with my time?
#65 Guest_user897_*
Posted 20 February 2013 - 06:17 PM
#66 Guest_user897_*
Posted 26 February 2013 - 09:22 PM
Thoughts?
#67
Posted 26 February 2013 - 10:36 PM
If the AGT Enterprise D was that up gunned; Could it be suggested that the "family starship" that was the Enterprise D was no longer present. Why seperate the saucer section, when the original purpose of the procedure is no longer there.
However, one can also say they Dumped the family Saucer, Added weapons atop and to the bottom of the saucer (A.K.A. the weapon that looks like a phaser rifle strapped on the belly of the saucer) and meant some sort of a Multi Vector Assault Possibility.
I think...if the "Big Gun" on the Saucer were to remain usable when separated from the engineering hull, her impulse systems could not handle the load. Some sort of power upgrade to the saucer would of been needed.
But again this is sheer speculation. Fun to talk about, but since we know so little of the AGT-Ent-D; I think it's just fun speculation.
Love Ships
ShipNerd
#68
Posted 27 February 2013 - 07:04 AM
And the saucer would still be useful as a life-boat, if the core breached.
#69 Guest_user897_*
Posted 27 February 2013 - 07:21 PM
#70
Posted 27 February 2013 - 07:52 PM
I think the Saucer Seperation sequence could definitely of been retained. But her purpose would be different.
When I look at the AGT Enterprise on Television, she more the personality of a Starship with Massively Upgraded Firepower. I mean...Think of the Plumbing needed for the Phaser arrays atop a Warp Nacelles. That's not a simple thing to do! This ship has Weapons all over her!!
So if she separated, I would think her Saucer section would be a separate combat entity. Requiring more power than the original "D" Saucer could provide. IMHO.
Then of course there is all those lifeboats still on the Saucer, which run contrary to the "No More Families In Alll Good Things...Enterprise D!!
Again fun to talk about, but sheer speculation.
Getting back the the TOY itself. I was wondering if anyone was aware of any movement on the Pennant Issue from DST on This HUGE/HEAVY ship!!!
ShipNerd
#71
Posted 01 March 2013 - 01:26 AM
Anyway, I like the added on elements, it gives new interesting look to the original D. I like the new paint additions on the reissue, those yellow highlights really do make the add-on bits pop. Since I have a yellow gundam marker, and those paint apps seem comparatively easy to add (as opposed to missing pennants), I'll be adding some yellow paint to this, someday.
However, I'm not quite happy with the execution on this particular specimen.
The third nacelle bit appears to only be attached to the hull in one spot, and not quite straight at that. The right side of the extra bit doesn't sit flush on the hull, particularly on the front side. there's a good .1" gap. And since it feels like it's only attached in one point, near the back of the hull, the entire third nacelle portion is pretty wobbly.
The bit attached to the saucer battery cover feels like it wasn't sitting flush when it was glued, and it floats just a little bit high. Just enough to look odd to me.
The third nacelle hull piece is the most visually obvious quality issue, but the one that terrifies me the most right now, is when I try to separate the saucer from the stardrive, the saucer nearly split open. Again, it feels like it was only glued in a few places, and nearly an entire half of it separates when I pull on it, even gently. Oddly, it is again mostly the right side, starting at the very rear, where the stardrive attaches, only the very left edge of that is glued shut, from there around the right side to the widest potion of the saucer it's not glued shut, and the left/front portion can start to be pulled apart too.
I do not have such separation issues on my original issue D, and it's really disconcerting that this one pulls apart so much. I'll try to glue it closed, but I'm not even sure what kind of glue to try using.
Any suggestions?
#73
Posted 03 March 2013 - 02:28 AM
Any idea how long that weapon would be...I mean...wow.
ShipNerd
#74 Guest_user897_*
Posted 10 March 2013 - 03:01 AM
#75
Posted 10 March 2013 - 09:26 AM
My pleasure user897 Appreciate the smooth trade! Please post pics of the finished product when you can.
With regards to the reissue, I absolutely love the additional painted-detail, but I do miss the pennants on the nacelles. I really, really hope that DST comes through with the decals!
#76 Guest_user897_*
Posted 10 March 2013 - 09:16 PM
#77
Posted 11 March 2013 - 12:33 AM
Although I wouldn't recommend it for the AGT
#78 Guest_user897_*
Posted 11 March 2013 - 01:29 AM
#79
Posted 16 June 2013 - 01:25 AM
If any of ya'll are still looking for the AGT Enterprise-D, Action Figure Xpress has it on sale for 50% off ($34.99). They also have the TNG style Klingon disruptor for 50% off ($34.99) and the WOK communicator for 50% off ($22.50).
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users