Any news on DST Data/Laforge wave?
#41
Posted 27 January 2007 - 08:03 AM
Oh & PS - the Data & La Forge figures DON'T come with Transporter Bases like the previous releases.
#42
Posted 27 January 2007 - 01:02 PM
I wish I could find some of these here where i live in MO It's hard trying to get them ebay sometimes, but I'm trying to make do lol.
#43
Posted 27 January 2007 - 01:05 PM
#44
Posted 27 January 2007 - 02:12 PM
now is it just me, or are these figs a little out of scale with the rest of the TNG? they just seem a bit...small
thats not taking away anything from either - i think they're great!
#45
Posted 27 January 2007 - 04:16 PM
#46
Posted 27 January 2007 - 04:18 PM
Or just pics in general from wave 3. Don't forget to take pics of accessories if possible.
Thankyou.
#47
Posted 27 January 2007 - 05:53 PM
Geordi..
Here's my current TNG line-up for size comparison.
#48
Posted 27 January 2007 - 07:41 PM
#49
Posted 27 January 2007 - 07:48 PM
So Geordi is about as tall as Troi?
Cheers for the pics.
#50
Posted 27 January 2007 - 07:58 PM
-EDIT-
BTW, does Geordi's VISOR come off?
#51
Posted 27 January 2007 - 08:20 PM
I kept one. I use it as a drink coaster!
So no phasers?
#52
Posted 27 January 2007 - 09:04 PM
HUGE thanks for posting those pics.
I'm sorry guys but I am getting more frustrated with each new wave. How come AA can't keep anything consistent? The new gloss look (and Geordi's long arms) just make them look like oversized Playmates figures. Yet, they are too small to fit in with the crew. I hope they look better in person.
#53
Posted 27 January 2007 - 10:20 PM
Those glossy pants look awful. Is the concept of having a unified-looking display that hard for DST/AA to grasp?
I don't mind not having the bases, since I only use one, for my desk at work.
Still, that's annoying. They gave us bases instead of stands, and I think most people, though disappointed, gave them a pass because the design was pretty cool. Then, on the third wave, they quietly omit them.
No phasers? But we get cats? Huh?
I'm forced to agree with Samwise. This line feels cheaper and cheaper with each release.
I'll finish out my TNG TV and NEM crews (assuming the NEM figures are made available), but this quality dropoff will likely turn me off of DST/AA Trek figures in general.
Of course, I'll pick up select figures if they ever do DS9 or VOY, and I'll get something from the TWOK line, but I doubt I'll be getting any complete crews if this keeps up. How can I continue to commit to DST/AA when they won't commit to producing a quality product?
(I realize I'm reacting without having the figures in hand, but those pictures seem pretty damning.)
#54
Posted 28 January 2007 - 01:14 AM
#55
Posted 28 January 2007 - 04:21 AM
#56
Posted 28 January 2007 - 06:14 AM
I think the problem is that the original release plans for the TNG figures just didn't work out like DST wanted them to. So now they have to rethink and reorganize things mid-line. So the growing pains the line is having is coming through on the figures themselves. While that's not good, let's hope DST is taking notes and learning lessons. Hopefully they will have all the kinks worked out by the time the DS9 line is finalized so that at least there will be consistency throughout that line and future ones.
The TWOK line might be a sign of things to come. So far they've shown off three figures that might consist of the core release of a first wave. Which means they might be organizing the line like they do the Stargate line, which seems to have done well for them. Hopefully that's the case as I feel that is a much better release plan/pattern. And, hopefully, the DS9 line follows suit as well.
#57
Posted 28 January 2007 - 07:46 AM
Maybe you're right, but DST learning things on TNG won't help us with our TNG displays.
And it's not like DST is new to releasing action figures. They've been in that business for years.
I don't see how the glossy pants can be related to a rethinking or reorganization of the line. It's just poor attention to detail. (Something you shouldn't try with the nitpickiest fans in all of fandom.)
This isn't a screwup along the lines of Giganto Illyria, but it's very disappointing and even less explainable.
#58
Posted 28 January 2007 - 08:30 AM
You have never spent any time on a prop forum have ya?
#59
Posted 28 January 2007 - 08:51 AM
A little, and yeah, those guys are understandable uber-picky.
Still. I'd guess that, of prop fans, the Trek prop fans are the pickiest.
#60
Posted 28 January 2007 - 09:56 AM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users