Star Trek XI Enterprise ship design
#1
Posted 03 April 2007 - 11:36 AM
#2
Posted 03 April 2007 - 11:52 AM
By reboot, do you mean starting a new timeline with Kirk and Spock, or starting a new timeline before Enterprise. The "Enterprise" and "1701" markings would seem to indicate the former, but the general design looks to me smaller than the '60's Enterprise, and even more primitive a design than the NX-01, and would thus suggest the latter.
All in all, for a Kirk/Spock reboot, I would prefer a more fluid (but not TNG-sleek) design, for whatever my opinion is worth. (I like how they paid hommage to the pilot with the spike on the ends of the Bussard collectors.)
#3
Posted 03 April 2007 - 11:55 AM
#4
Posted 03 April 2007 - 11:59 AM
By reboot I mean reboot. For all I know, they might have Archer, Kirk and Picard in the same era. That's a reboot.
I think it will be about Kirk and Spock, but with no relation whatsoever to the established continuity.
#6
Posted 03 April 2007 - 12:15 PM
#7
Posted 03 April 2007 - 12:20 PM
Star Trek needed a reboot. It's because they didn't have the balls to make ENT a reboot and desperately tried to make it fit with established continuity (and it did fit) that ENT failed. Too much continuity binds the hands of the creative talent.
#8
Posted 03 April 2007 - 12:47 PM
When I went over to the original link to see it, up top it said Happy April Fools. Who knows though. It IS a nice looking ship though.
*EDIT* - Here's the website I saw: http://trekmovie.com.../TrekXI-Ent.jpg
#9
Posted 03 April 2007 - 01:12 PM
#10
Posted 03 April 2007 - 02:10 PM
#11
Posted 03 April 2007 - 04:52 PM
#12
Posted 03 April 2007 - 06:12 PM
#13
Posted 03 April 2007 - 06:58 PM
Wow one more reboot thread.
Burns, you so want to believe don't you?
#14
Posted 04 April 2007 - 02:41 AM
#15
Posted 05 April 2007 - 10:05 PM
#16
Posted 06 April 2007 - 10:17 AM
You can also look forward to any number of 'hot' young actresses having their heads photoshopped onto bodies wearing TOS miniskirts claiming they were smuggled out of costume fittings.
It's all so depressing.........
#17
Posted 06 April 2007 - 10:37 AM
#18
Posted 06 April 2007 - 11:02 AM
#19
Posted 06 April 2007 - 08:18 PM
#20
Posted 07 April 2007 - 03:18 AM
I'm even more disquieted by whispers I've heard that the new movie is going to jump around in time ~ obviously if this is so then it would be to accommodate the appearance of Shatner and Nimoy, and this is what makes me worried:that notions of good, tight plotting are going to be sacrificed to what Paramount thinks will be a popluarist movie. They made a mistake of catering to popularist notions in Nemesis, and IMHO, if a plots is going to jump around in time, there had better be a good reason for it that is actually germane to the idea.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users