The next ship
#1
Posted 26 August 2006 - 10:09 PM
My guess is on the Enterprise-D. I think it would be cool for the anniversary and would it look amazing in the grand DST style.
I WANT a Voyager next though. She is by far one of my favorite ships. I hope that if DST does continue the ships line, that we at least get the main players. Ent-D, Voyager, and DS9 (wow - that would one be amazing!).
#2
Posted 26 August 2006 - 11:38 PM
I would love to see a Klingon ship also though.
#3
Posted 27 August 2006 - 12:53 AM
#4
Posted 27 August 2006 - 06:30 AM
#5
Posted 27 August 2006 - 11:30 AM
#6
Posted 27 August 2006 - 03:15 PM
#7
Posted 27 August 2006 - 03:17 PM
#8
Posted 27 August 2006 - 03:24 PM
#9
Posted 27 August 2006 - 03:25 PM
#10
Posted 27 August 2006 - 05:34 PM
#11
Posted 27 August 2006 - 06:16 PM
Its weird how much the fans have lost interest in the line. I'm not sure if it is the fact that there is no Trek on the air or that fans are just disillusioned. I thought the Ent-E had done well, but I've been hearing the same things about its lackluster sales. Maybe the 1701 will bring things around again.
#12
Posted 27 August 2006 - 06:43 PM
#13
Posted 27 August 2006 - 07:41 PM
#14
Posted 27 August 2006 - 07:56 PM
Yeah, I don't mind the one ship at a time, but I do want more ships though. Also, Donster are you hinting at something there in your last line? A simple yes or no will suffice.
We know that DST is still up in the air over the ship line. If Paramount plays it right and does the anniverssary stuff big ... maybe the toys will have some luck and people will start picking them up. DSTs advertising department needs to get with Paramount about putting them in the loop.
I so need a toy company job!
#15
Posted 27 August 2006 - 08:31 PM
I actually think there are more JL ships sold via the internet than in brick and mortar stores. Out of the many, many stores we have here, i have only seen two ships ever in a brick and mortar store. Seems like Toysrus only gets one set of the ships and they may never even make it to the shelves. Online sales make up most of the sales i think.
#16
Posted 27 August 2006 - 08:39 PM
We know that DST is still up in the air over the ship line. If Paramount plays it right and does the anniverssary stuff big ... maybe the toys will have some luck and people will start picking them up. DSTs advertising department needs to get with Paramount about putting them in the loop.
I so need a toy company job!
There are so many factors that play into it when you are trying to compare the DST ships to the JL ships and even to the Playmates ships.
The main reason for the delay between the E-A and the E-E is that AA was having a very rocky time in the interim before DST too k over the license. Then, after DST took the license, they had to settle into the way the line had to be run. There were growing pains and those pains contineued even during the production of the E-E, marked by the miscommunications that omitted the play cover from the ship.
The JL ships are a different beast. They are smaller, with no electrronics. They take a bit less time in development, so they can take the same amount of time to develop a wave of 6 ships as DST/AA has to take to develop one ship. JL probably has a bit more resources and manpower which, again, can give them an edge in the same time frame.
Playmates, again, was a much larger compnay than DST with far more resources. They catered regularly to large retail chains. Hence they were able to crank out more stuff, more regularly, and in greater quantities.
Really, it's not all that fair to compare these three entities. Things are differeent. The type of company producing the toys is different, the retail demand is different, the customer base is different, the entire market for these toys is different.
#17
Posted 27 August 2006 - 08:55 PM
#18
Posted 27 August 2006 - 09:26 PM
I'm just trying to present alternate points of view. I never said mine was the only or the right opinion. I'm just trying to get people to look at things from all angles. The view can look a lot different when you are standing somewhere else. I just want everyone to be more understanding and open-minded.
#19
Posted 27 August 2006 - 09:32 PM
Playmates moved in and explored the often neglected action figure aspect of Trek and bascially hit it out of the park for the time.
Fast forward to when AA had the license. Some of the best Star Trek products ever produced, but they had just been hammered by Paramount insisting that they start with Enterprise instead of Classic figures. From what I read that hit set AA back and they bascially had to play catch up so their entire company didn't go under. That was when development problems seemed to begin along with mfr. delays, product delays etc. With all of these delays many collectors got fed up and start dropping off from the hobby out of frustration.
Diamond comes in specializinig in speciality lines like Buffy and figure there is a niche here they can develop. However they have alot of "repairs" they have to make to get the Trek license out there and moving. Even if they decide to stop producing ships for awhile I wouldn't be surprised to see them revisit the line at some point and try it out again.
What I'm curious about is if this Abrams Star Trek idea actually comes about...who will get the license. Will Paramount go to Hasbro or some other company to produce mass-market figures while Diamond produces more collectible stuff? If vehicles are done I wonder who would get to produce the amped up Gen X (or whatever generation we're in now) version of the Enterprise? Considering in Star Trek the ships are as much of an important character as the actual human characters, I would find it hard to believe there would be a) no mass market action figures and b)no toy of the ship.
#20
Posted 27 August 2006 - 11:30 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users